AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 02:24:48 -0800

Title: RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallab outswisscom dumping)
o.k. I'm looking to write in my English. I hope you can understand this better.
 
I think this is not realy a legal question. I think the Systemadministrators, wouldn't search a "Nadel im Heuhaufen".
And i think too, this is not verry simple to search this File... In the logs are only E-Mailadress and Subjects and IP's
If  document will be send by copier... you see only in Subject "Attached image", and as sender only [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wouldn't see the man which must search this document....
 
Xaver 
 
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Im Auftrag von Kuster, Christian
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. M�rz 2005 11:16
An: '[email protected]'
Betreff: RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)

Sounds like Bablefish ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Guazzoni Daniele, CH
Sent: Dienstag, 15. M�rz 2005 11:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche?
(it'aallab outswisscom dumping)


Maybe I worked until late yesterday, maybe the coffe this mornig was'nt strong enough...
I tried 5 times to read this mail and I still can't get any logical sentence out of it.
If someone of you could translate the mail of Xaver maybe...

Daniele

-----Original Message-----
From: Xaver Aerni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March, 2005 10:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: AW: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche? (it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)

I do not think that am umbedingt only one legal question, but none has to
find the desire x-hours a needle in heap of hay.
Besides with the headers and senders and receivers one comes not far...
If we of ours copy which mailen is called it in the header always "Attached
image" and with the sender is allways "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" That becomes merry
with looking for...:-D)
But I think two migros and Swisscom has a havier problem...


-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Martin Ebn�ther
Gesendet: Montag, 14. M�rz 2005 09:16
An: [email protected]
Betreff: RE: [swinog] indymedia becoming our new netzwoche?
(it'aallaboutswisscom dumping)


> -----Original Message-----

> The last paragraph is rather funny. I guess, the ISPs they asked
> did pay too much as well. =:-)

Ahm... this wasn't the last paragraph, but the page did not load
completely. =:-/

Well anyway, I mean these lines:
"Mehrere Provider wurden angefragt, das skandaltr�chtige E-Mail
 in ihrem Rechner zu suchen. Aus Datenschutzgr�nden haben diese
 das Gesuch jedoch abgelehnt."

CU, Venty
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog



_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If

the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail

and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog 

_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Antwort per Email an