nearly same story as sdsl before, VTX used 2 IP out of the customer /29 range for the wan link. Traceroute looked funny, not to mention how that "improved" icmp Trouble
Cheers ...
Am 8 Jun 2007 um 1:09 hat Daniel Roethlisberger geschrieben:
Date sent: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 01:09:56 +0200
From: Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] vtx ADSL /30 subnet practice
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:swinog-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:swinog-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pascal Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-06-07:
> [snip]
> > This is the normal routed case. I think this is what Daniel was
> > looking for.
>
> Not quite, but oh never mind. The point I was trying to make is the
> fact that vtx engineers explained to a customer that he would not be
> able to assign *any* address of his /30 subnet to a server behind his
> ADSL router because all of the subnet would be consumed by the link from
> the LNS to the ADSL router (I guess this hasn't come across too well
> from my message).
>
> It seems nobody can imagine how this is supposed to be the case, so I
> guess that confirms that it's probably bogus information. Thanks anyway
> for all responses!
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
> --
> Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> _______________________________________________
> swinog mailing list
> swinog@lists.swinog.ch
> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
csdatabrasil Ltda.
Roger Schmid
Rua Arquiteto Luiz Nunes 186
Imbiribeira
CEP: 51170-430
Recife/ PE
BR +55 81 3422 1714
US: +1 360 515 33 80
CH: +41 32 5110858
UK: +44 8444845331
VOIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<attachment: linha.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
