Daniel Roethlisberger wrote: > Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-05: >> We've got a customer whose emails (from other people but filtered by >> us) are frequently being rejected by Netstreams harsh SPF-check. >> I've asked Netstream to add our servers to their whitelist, but >> nothing has happened. > > As a more generic alternative, you could implement SRS in order to > handle forwarding in an ``SPF compliant'' way. This will fix the > problem for all receivers which use SPF for scoring or rejection.
We have been thinking about SRS for a while - I'm wondering if SRS is "safe" for mailservers that don't implement SPF/SRS? (I'll do my research anyway, but just in case you know right away). /Per Jessen, Herrliberg -- http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business. _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
