maybe some hacker getting hired to locate a child-porn pic on the first page of some unwanted politician. that would be then a reason for filtering this page.
slowly the internet starts to get unusable ... and be the playground of some organisation and government. Roger > I know that it is futile. there it's about the "Prinzip" - I hate to have to > use some anonymizer to use > archive.org (where I did download some stuff in the past years, as they don't > only host "websites" > In this regard, I still trust my ISP not to put one of these boxes in use any > time.... > I mean, there is not only "child p..." anymore, we begin to see the > collateral damage, on wikipedia > or now this try, I remember reading about germany asking to block online > gambling sites next - > what comes next?? Perhabs the hacker tool sites get blocked in germany? > silvan > Am 15.01.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Jeroen Massar: > > Silvan Gebhardt wrote: > Hi > I just read about the blocking of archive.org (which is for me an > ususal site(!) > ( > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Britische-Jugendschuetzer-lassen-Internet-Archiv- > blockieren--/meldung/121754 > ) is one source, which refers to > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/iwf_details_archive_blacklisting/ > Do We have to expect that the ISP using the white clean box do block > archive.org soon (and as the article states, probably completely?) > > Guess Google Cache will be next th > > _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
