Tonnerre Lombard wrote: > Salut, Michael, > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:32:25 +0100, Michael Naef wrote: >> http://aeolus.ch/home/blog.php#Idioten%20Signaturen > > What's the problem with these disclaimers in signatures? > > Tonnerre > > DISCLAIMER: IF YOU RECEIVE THIS EMAIL IN ERROR, YOU ARE HEREBY LEGALLY > OBLIGED TO PHYSICALLY DESTROY ALL MEDIA WHICH EVER CONTAINED THE MAIL > (HARD DISKS, MEMORY, ETC. OF BOTH THE WORKSTATION AND THE MAIL > SERVERS), ALONG WITH ALL MATERIAL USED TO TRANSFER, LIQUIDATE ANY > COWORKERS WHICH MIGHT HAVE HAD A GLANCE OF THE EMAIL (ESPECIALLY THE > SYSTEM ADMINISTRATORS), AND RASP YOUR HEAD OFF WITH A VERY FINE > GRATER.
For starters, they're barely readable when they're in all-caps :-) My personal favourite is: By sending email to me or to a mailing list to which I subscribe, and appending more than 4 lines of legalese at the end, you are expressly permitting me to use your email and others coming from your domain as I see fit; by posting you are accepting that your long legally sounding signature is invalid. /Per Jessen, Herrliberg _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
