Andreas Fink <[email protected]> wrote: > The german text says despite the recurs of Cyberlink, it stays in force: > > "Der Rekurs hat keine aufschiebende Wirkung aauf die > Untersuchungshandlungen ; der angefochtene > Entscheid ist trotz des Rekurses Rechtskräftig, es sei denn der > Untersuchungsrichter hat das Gegenteil entschieden"
The order from December 17 would have remained in force if it had not been suspended by means of the order from February 11. > Also, the original "order" was not sent to me, I wonder most about the > sentence > > "gegen die vorliegende Verfügung keine Rechtsmittel möglich > sind". That is part of the order from February 11 which suspends the effect of the order of December 17 until a higher court has decided about Cyberlink's opposition. > So a judge decides to force me to do anything without hearing my > voice, without giving me the right to oppose is really out of my sense > of democracy and law. No, the one decision concerning which ISPs were not giving a right to oppose was the judge's decision to suspend his own order. Greetings, Norbert _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
