On 20 Apr 2009, at 21:49, Peter Guhl Listenempfänger wrote: > Well, it depends. While blocking without loggin isn't good for > anything at all
In the UK we have -- we are told -- blocking without logging, because the intent of the blocking is to prevent the *accidental* discovery of child abuse images. Andy _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
