Lets keep this "brief": Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > well, I'm not crazy to develop a new ultimate spam killer from scratch :)
http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-12 > but those groups don't seem to propose something new either. Wow, you where able to read the IETF, IRTF and MAAWG lists in such a short time? > I'm just telling that SMTP is not the right protocol for email delivery: http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#senior-IETF-member-5 > -- why do client-to-server and server-to-server have to be the same protocol > on the same TCP port? These are completely different tasks with different > domains of control, so they have to be two different protocols. Why would you want two different ones? You do realize that the Internet is a network of networks, and that there is no separation between users and server eh? > -- there's no obligatory identity check. Well, most ISPs have SMTP > authentication > for users, but on server2server path, there's none. http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-6 http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-7 > -- With wide spread of patent-free cryptography algorithms, why aren't the > digital certificates obligatory? http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-8 > ... and so on. > > I just say that now it's the only chance to deploy something new, as IPv6 > deployment is already something new. There won't be another chance for > ditching > some old rusty legacy stuff :) http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-12 Lets say that I just suggest you start reading a lot more first ;) Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
