Things should be back to normal. -- Matthias
Am 04.01.10 21:24, schrieb [email protected]: > Hi > > We're investigating. > > Cheers > Günti > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [swinog] swinog Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 > > here same problem, bluewin is death > > bluewin dns > 195.186.1.110 > 195.186.4.110 > > kind regards mark > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Im Auftrag von [email protected] > Gesendet: Montag, 4. Januar 2010 21:07 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: swinog Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 > > Send swinog mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: > Contents of swinog digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Bluewin DNS problems (Benjamin Schlageter) > 2. Re: Bluewin DNS problems (Flavio Tischhauser) > 3. Re: Bluewin DNS problems (Umberto Annino) > 4. Re: Bluewin DNS problems (Adrian Ulrich) > 5. Re: Bluewin DNS problems (Simon Leins) > 6. Re: Bluewin DNS problems (Benjamin Schlageter) > 7. routing quirks with IP-MAN (Marc SCHAEFER) > 8. Re: Bluewin DNS problems (Romain Bourdy) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:16:14 +0100 > From: Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > Subject: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <c767fd0e.28c5%[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi > > Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? > As I saw, my router can?t resolve any domains... Lucky I got some other dns > servers =) > > Cheers, > Benjamin > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.swinog.ch/public/swinog/attachments/20100104/d62048f8/attachme > nt-0001.htm> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:37:03 +0100 > From: Flavio Tischhauser <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > Cc: SWINOG <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 20:16, Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? >> As I saw, my router can?t resolve any domains... Lucky I got some >> other > dns servers =) >> > > Same here, also receiving IMs from other swisscom customers telling me that > "their internet is broken". > > regards > > Flavio > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:37:25 +0100 > From: "Umberto Annino" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I don't KNOW anything about it, but I am experiencing the same here, since > about one hour. Some sites respond well, others not or only very shaky or > partial. > > DNS query time between 500-700ms. > > I particularly like how bluewin is capable of presenting me a NICE and > easy-to-find status page of their service - NOT. stone age or what? > > regards, > Umbi > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:16:14 +0100 >> Von: Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > >> Hi >> >> Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? >> As I saw, my router can?t resolve any domains... Lucky I got some >> other dns servers =) >> >> Cheers, >> Benjamin > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:40:53 +0100 > From: Adrian Ulrich <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > >> Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? > > No: Bluewin-DNS is fine for me. But i had some ADSL problems on 2-3. Jan: > I had about ~30% packet loss with any (?) gateway in 195.186.252.0/24. > > Re-Connecting until i got a gateway in the 253-range fixed the problem for me > > Regards, > Adrian > > > > -- > RFC 1925: > (11) Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and > a different presentation, regardless of whether it works. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:46:11 +0100 > From: Simon Leins <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Pity, it's going to be a pain for Youporn stats tonight. Can't seem to find > out anything on Swisscom or IP-Plus website. > > - Simon > > > > > 2010/1/4 Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > >> Hi >> >> Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? >> As I saw, my router can?t resolve any domains... Lucky I got some other > dns >> servers =) >> >> Cheers, >> Benjamin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swinog mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.swinog.ch/public/swinog/attachments/20100104/941af661/attachme > nt-0001.htm> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:54:44 +0100 > From: Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <c7680614.28d4%[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Which of them do you use? 195.186.1.162 and 195.186.4.162 don't answer me on > dig... And these one uses my router. > > > Am 04.01.10 20:40 schrieb "Adrian Ulrich" unter <[email protected]>: > >>> Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? >> >> No: Bluewin-DNS is fine for me. But i had some ADSL problems on 2-3. Jan: >> I had about ~30% packet loss with any (?) gateway in 195.186.252.0/24. >> >> Re-Connecting until i got a gateway in the 253-range fixed the problem >> for me >> >> Regards, >> Adrian >> >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:02:33 +0100 > From: Marc SCHAEFER <[email protected]> > Subject: [swinog] routing quirks with IP-MAN > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, > > It seems the Swiss POP for sixxs (IPv6 connectivity) is unreachable > from Cablecom (net2000), Sunrise ADSL, Bluewin ADSL, but is reachable > from Green ADSL. > > For the records, http://www.sixxs.net/) is where you can get free IPv6 > on IPv4 tunnels when your ISP hasn't yet arranged for IPv6 end-user delivery > (most don't). > > It used to be reachable in november 2009 when I did my last tests, on > Cablecom (net2000). > > The IP address of the POP is: 194.1.163.40 > > Looks like this is a /24 (PI) within IP-MAN's AS. > > Does anyone has an idea why it is not routed correctly ? > (SIXXS is working on it, however, what's behind the scene interests me). > > Is this because it's a lone /24, and most providers don't peer correctly > for less than /22 ? An administrative problem (like when EUnet was > routed through Amsterdam for SWITCH customers -- well at least > it was routed!) > > Or is it because IP-MAN wants direct peering and doesn't announce the > prefix globally ? Maybe to avoid being charged by strange peering plans ? > > Thanks ;) > have a nice new year 2010! > > PS: I am especially interested because I am considering to route a old /24 > from a /15 (allocation unspecified) somehow, and want to see if it is > really usually unfeasible from a global routing perspective, or > from the practical quirks of commercial operators today. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:06:45 +0100 > From: Romain Bourdy <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems > To: Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > Same issue here with these two DNS servers as DSL customer. > Thanks to google we got easy to type/remember Backup dns servers 8.8.8.8 > > -Romain > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Benjamin Schlageter <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Which of them do you use? 195.186.1.162 and 195.186.4.162 don't answer me > on >> dig... And these one uses my router. >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > > End of swinog Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 > ************************************* > > > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
