> I think it's far too early to jump into conclusions right now. The court > didn't even state it's reasons in detail. As far as I understand it right > now, this does only mean one has to take care about data that contains ip > addresses - but not, that such data processing would be a legal problem at > all...
Well, the court doesn't state anything in detail in a press release. It's in the court decision document. But we're off-topic I think. Lets just aggregate all open questions and I'll get answers from a qualified person, a lawyer, not techies like us ;-) Pascal _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
