On 2013-09-26 15:01 , Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > Am 26.09.2013 12:33, schrieb Jeroen Massar: >>> Anyone else seeing this... do we have a new peering spat or is it >>> just a random routing issue? >> >> Looks to be just that prefix, as for instance: > > Actually we've seen more than 300 prefixes with the same path.
Then I took a lucky path which worked ;) > Meanwhile > the journey to california and back is history. Good. It is always a bit surprising indeed to see when those problems happen. > Apparently there was just a BGP session down between L3(GBLX) and UPC. > Not much n+1, though... Not everybody gets that right, they learn though after a while ;) > Nevermind and sorry for the noise. I would definitely say Signal as it covered a problem affecting the Internet in Switzerland which likely affected quite a few people on the list and possibly more importantly their users. Noise would have been "Sudan is broken" Greets, Jeroen _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
