On Wed, 7 May 2014 16:44:44 +0200, <[email protected]> said: > On Wed, 07 May 2014 16:15:32 +0200 > Daniel Stirnimann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> nic.ch is in the ch zone itself. So it's not a zone of its own. > Hhmm... in times long gone, it was possible to register MX > records for domains that were only used for mail directly in the CH tld. > This was later stopped, claiming the tld should exclusively be used for > domain delegations, not direct resource records. While I understand the > intention of putting nic.ch directly as a resource record into .ch, > isn't this a violation of that rule that was established then? I'm not going to comment this, but maybe the following anecdote will make you feel better. I originally wanted to use ns.ch for the ch name servers. This was turned down internally because it would violate our "two-letter second level domain rule", which, I'm sure you know, makes these domains unavailable for registration with the exception of the "Kantonskürzel", which are assigned to the proper authorities. -- Alex _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
