On 2015-04-23 08:50, Antoine Benkemoun-Andre wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > We are in the process of evaluating “cloud" firewall solutions such as > FortiVM. The promise of these virtual appliances looks interesting and it > seems like a great fit given our current infrastructure is based off of > Fortigate physical appliances. > > Nonetheless, I can’t help but think that given the virtual appliance > nature of these solutions there could be a number of limitations to it.
Instead of naming a specific solution, why not specify your requirements? Greets, Jeroen _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog