Am 19.02.2018 um 13:12 schrieb Ralph Krämer:
> I am sure this is mentioned somewhere in one of the RFCs - but I currently
> have no time to look this up.
rfc1912 references in "CNAME records" section
> Don't use CNAMEs in combination with RRs which point to other names
> like MX, CNAME, PTR and NS. (PTR is an exception if you want to
> implement classless in-addr delegation.)
to rfc974, which sez in "Minor Special Issues" section
> Note that the algorithm to delete irrelevant RRs breaks if LOCAL has
> a alias and the alias is listed in the MX records for REMOTE. (E.g.
> REMOTE has an MX of ALIAS, where ALIAS has a CNAME of LOCAL). This
> can be avoided if aliases are never used in the data section of MX RRs
I know of several big esp that reject if rcpt mx is resolved by a cname-rr
swinog mailing list