Good SWINOGers, I am seeking your evaluation of how well my data matches your perception.
Firstly, however, I beg pardon for cross-posting; this thread appears in other operator mailing lists. I am trying to reach as many operators as possible. Please find here <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eZZeqbDaTj6nSJJDdK0iu5Xm9Z_691rR&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs> a snapshot of two datasets concerning access technologies in the metro area. The bar chart on the left (not on the right, as inadvertently posted on NANOG) summarizes data I collected last year from *NOGs; the bar chart on the right summarizes data received through commissioned market research, from Tier 1 and/or regional operators. The y-axis shows cumulative responses for an option; the x-axis shows monikers for the access technologies. A second snapshot <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fMLiEGbvaD4pqCmQM75HWYoR37XaiHFQ&authuser=etienne.depasquale%40um.edu.mt&usp=drive_fs> shows the same data, but this time with each response weighted by a conservative estimate of the respondent's subscriber base across all geographical regions. Here, the y-axis shows an estimate of the number of subscribers using the access technology. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Sincerely, -- Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale Assistant Lecturer Department of Communications & Computer Engineering Faculty of Information & Communication Technology University of Malta Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
