On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:51:41 +0200 Serge Droz via swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch> wrote:
> It's actually a pretty smart and light way of protection the majority > of users from malware. And yes, there will always be false positives. Do you plan to compensate financial losses through that behaviour, i.e. you block a webshop, a bank, an insurance? Do you plan to compensate health issues through that behaviour, i.e. you block an important health service? Do you plan to compensate social issues through that behaviour, i.e. you block an important social service, maybe a forum for unstable personalities, who rely on that platform? Maybe to avoid suicide? Are you sure, that this mechanism is "smart"? Maybe protection against malware is less important, than you think when you don't know the consequences of your actions. Best Regards Oli -- Automatic-Server AG ••••• Oliver Schad Geschäftsführer Hardstr. 46 9434 Au | Schweiz www.automatic-server.com | oliver.sc...@automatic-server.com Tel: +41 71 511 31 11 | Mobile: +41 76 330 03 47
pgpA_fGXM9M7j.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
