> On 11 Aug 2025, at 10:05, Simon Leinen via swinog <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Dear SwiNOGgers, and in particular those who peer with us (Switch),
>
> we have finally gotten around to implementing the recommendation[1] to
> use "hierarchical" names for our as-set in the RIPE RR/DB. So instead
> of "AS-SWITCH", we now use "AS559:AS-SWITCH". Please update your filter
> generation accordingly if you peer with us.
>
> Our PeeringDB entry[2] and AS559 policy in the RIPE DB have been updated
> accordingly.
Congrats, and properly executed:
...
as-set: AS-SWITCH
descr: *** Superseded - Please use AS559:AS-SWITCH instead ***
remarks: see
https://manrs.org/2022/12/why-network-operators-should-use-hierarchical-as-sets/
members: AS559:AS-SWITCH
...
Now to do a check of participant networks at the previous SwiNOG and put up a
list of non-MANRS compliance folks on a slide for during the breaks to convince
others to get on board with the whole MANRS program.
Greets,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
