> Have a look at the NANOG archives. This thread pops up every > few months (in the moment going on again). > > To put it in a nutshell: > > 1. while not only table size is a matter, the more prefixes you have the > more flaps/withraws you see. And also the shorter a prefix the less you see > flapping. And flapping is what really hurts. So less flapping/withdrwas > means great mprovement in stabilty. > > 2. address space which is still unallocated or private address sapce or special > address space should neither show up in the global routing table nor at any > IXP. I guess that goes without saying. > > 3. When it comes to announcing more specifics you open up a religious war. > So I'll stop to say more about that.
That's why i have done http://zebra.swinog.ch/wwwbin/badnetworks P. ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
