Nope, because our autoresponder send only one answer per person and per day.
You mean per distinct 'From:' line, not per address (because for some reason I have _two_ autoresponses in my mailbox with two different message IDs). If I randomize the From-Line (Blah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Foo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) then I can still use it as a mailbomber, can't I?
> About the "Precedence: bulk" in the header, anybody have a RFC > reference ?
Not a RFC reference, but you might find this useful:
http://untroubled.org/qmail-autoresponder/procedure.txt
procmail has also a nice macro for this called ^FROM_DAEMON, which expands to:
"If the regular expression contains `^FROM_DAEMON' it will be substitut- ed by `(^(Mailing-List:|Precedence:.*(junk|bulk|list)|To: Multiple recipients of |(((Resent-)?(From|Sender)|X-Envelope-From):|>?From )([^>]*[^([EMAIL PROTECTED])?(Post(ma?(st(e?r)?|n)|office)|(send)?Mail(er)? |daemon|m(mdf|ajordomo)|n?uucp|LIST(SERV|proc)|NETSERV|o(wner|ps) |r(e(quest|sponse)|oot)|b(ounce|bs\.smtp)|echo|mirror|s(erv(ices?|er) |mtp(error)?|ystem)|A(dmin(istrator)?|MMGR|utoanswer))(([^).!:a- z0-9][-_a-z0-9]*)?[%@>\t ][^<)]*(\(.*\).*)?)?$([^>]|$)))', which should catch mails coming from most daemons (how's that for a regular expression :-)."
from procmail(5); procmailex(5) has an example on how to write a autoresponder.
HTH.
daniel
---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
