If you want to write a decent stack, implement both and let BGP negotiate, because you will find both in this cruel world....
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Simon Leinen
Sent: Montag, 9. August 2004 16:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] BGP and IPv6
Pascal Gloor writes:
>> as I'm currently trying to write BGP multiprotocol support for
>> OpenBSD's bgpd I would like to know which is the common setup.
>> Mainly I'm intrested if you are using a shared IPv4 session or one
>> session per protocol?
> I personally prefer IPv4 prefixes over IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes over
> IPv6. It keeps your setup clear and avoids any mix of protocols,
> etc...
We do the same here - separate sessions with IPv4 prefixes exchanged
over IPv4, IPv6 prefixes over IPv6. As Pascal said, it's easier to
set up and debug, although it does seem slightly wasteful.
--
Simon.
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
