Hi Richard,
In data giovedì, 9 febbraio 2012 12.14:01, Richard Jones ha scritto:
> Either of those approaches would work with SWORDv2. The question is
> probably whether you ever want to deliver a MARCXML record only to Invenio
> without any additional file content. If so, then being able to just post
> an atom entry with the embedded metadata would be valuable.
thanks a lot for your fast answer. Indeed Invenio was originally designed to
handle the MARCXML and later it was extended to support managing digital
objects.
So definitively it would be a common use case to simply create a resource with
just the pure MARCXML record.
So if having, within the entry tag, a structured <marc:record> would be
regarded as compatible (I was in doubt since in the specs you always mention:
"The client SHOULD add Dublin Core [DublinCore] terms to the Atom Entry [...];
the terms MUST be embedded as direct children of the atom:entry element [...]"
), with the SWORD profile I would go in this direction.
Thanks again for your advice!
Cheers,
Samuele
--
Samuele Kaplun
Invenio Developer ** <http://invenio-software.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
sword-app-tech mailing list
sword-app-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-tech
