Whether or not the selection is clearly defined by the specification, in
practice I think it will always be a case of "server decides".  I don't think
the equal q-values add any additional difficulty to that.

#g
--

Ian Stuart wrote:
> On 19/01/11 08:06, Richard Jones wrote:
>> and your content negotiation header says:
>>
>> Accept: A; q=1.0, B; q=0.8
>> Accept-Packaging: Z; q=1.0, X; q=1.0
>>
>> Which combination do you return?
> I agree its not a clear-cut case..... however it also has to be said 
> that the content negotiation header isn't helping by declaring two 
> options to be of equal "value"
> 
> I would say:
> A+Z, then A+X, then B+Z, then B+X
> 
> .... FIFO-style
> 
> (after all, if you have a preference for order, try:
> 
>   Accept-Packaging: X; q=1.0, Z; q=1.0
> 
> instead)
> 
> 
> Even under the concept of a combined Accept model, what do you do when 
> you receive
> 
>   Accept-Media-Feature: A(Z); q=1.0, A(X); q=1.0, B(Z); q=0.8, B(X); q=0.8
> 
> 









------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Sword-app-techadvisorypanel mailing list
Sword-app-techadvisorypanel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sword-app-techadvisorypanel

Reply via email to