symlinks rather than copying are definitely the way to go and it's probably worth keeping both ways of building for now. Um, I think I might have set up kmail wrong for my reply with the patch hasn't appeared here. It may have been sent from a different address and got stuck.
Daniel On 12 Nov 2001 at 15:24, Troy A. Griffitts sent forth the message: > > No, usually when doing a full build is when it happens-- not when > developing. The copying time isn't a problem, but instead rebuilding > the entire archive each make. This probably isn't much of an issue > either, but just wanted to talk about it. > > -Troy. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Maybe we could key off of the debug flag; if debug is true, we'll > > > assume someone is developing and we should build the way it currently > > > builds; but otherwise, we'll do your recommended method. dunno. what > > > do you think? > > > > Isn't it especially when you are developing that this problem occurs? > > Do you really think the copying time would matter? > > If so, creating symlinks (not possible on windows?) might be sufficient. > > > > Martin > > > > -- > > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > > http://www.gmx.net _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
