> EXACTLY! :D There are only a small group of programmers > working on Sword, but I think many many more people out there > are capable of tagging texts with ThML mark up. Anyone can do > that. Once we have a ThML manager/viewer I think that many > more people would join the effort of placing texts into ThML. > It would not be long before Sword could boast of having more > texts available in their format than Logos or QuickVerse.
I would like to see 1000 modules complete by year's end. We're about 740 modules from that goal right now. Between everything in OLB and everything on CCEL, I think we've got a signifigant body of works to import. > I am just wondering, since this jump to general book support > is so huge, wouldn't it warrant a 2.0 designation? It's not that huge, in terms of the library. :) It's huge in terms of utility and user experience, but it uses such a similar API to our other classes that some utilities written for RawText & the other drivers still work for RawGenBook. --Chris
