Well if \bword\b is actually a solution, then presumably coding up an 
"exact word match" option
should be easy. Just substitute the \b before each word and call the 
regexp code.

Actually I thought I was pretty expert in regexps, but I havn't heard of \b.

David Burry wrote:

>In most open source projects I've seen, people primarily write free code because they 
>want to use it, the fact that others may (or may not) find it useful too is 
>secondary.  It seems to be a natural thing that open source in general fosters among 
>the selfish human race.  It's not as bad here as we all seem to have more of a 
>"missionary" spirit, but it's still a lot of work to code, so I know I need to get 
>really excited about something before I'll dive headlong into it (and if you're 
>already more excited about it than me then you'll likely beat me to it).  Does that 
>help explain some?
>
>Dave
>
>
>At 03:48 PM 4/24/2002 -0600, Jorge Chacon wrote:
>
>>Well,
>>
>>With all the prospective users I know, not even a 2-hour class on
>>regular expressions would do the trick.
>>
>>Seriously, is our target computer-savvy users or Christians that happen
>>to use a computer?  I do not claim to know the answer, but the answer to
>>this question should dictate the solution.
>>
>>Jorge
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 15:19, Chris Little wrote:
>>
>>>We could use this as a good excuse to start teaching the commoners about 
>>>regular expressions.  Anyone feel like finding/writing a regex tutorial 
>>>for the FAQ?
>>>
>>>--Chris
>>>
>>>On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 03:03 AM, Chris Bitmead wrote:
>>>
>>>>Call me a "fool" but I think this is too geeky for your typical bible 
>>>>reader. And the ability to search
>>>>for a word is, well, pretty fundamental don't you think?
>>>>
>>>>Jacob Daniel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I believe that \bfool\b with Regular Expression search should work.
>>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Martin Gruner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I wish you could do plain word searches in Sword. I.e. I wish
>>>>>>>I could search for "fool" without getting all references to "foolish"
>>>>>>>for example.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>You can. Search for " fool ", using exact search.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Martin
>>>>>>
>>>


Reply via email to