> On 31 Aug 2002 at 19:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Got it - thanks. I'll take a look at the code when I get time - just out > of interest to see how you generated it. It's interesting - and seems > right quite a lot of the time. Can't understand why most entries have two > identical Strongs numbers after them though. Good work. Thanks.
They should have different morphological tags. Turn on morphological tags to see the difference. -- Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
