I personally think this is a good idea. Once we have the general books, placing that data into a Bible, once the library supports these books, will be trivial and systematic.
Patrick,
The library current uses a hardcoded static 'canon' of verses (defined in canon.h). To make the CORRECT changes to make the library to support these extra-Biblical works in the 'Bible' drivers is not a 'simple fix'.
-Troy.
Patrick Narkinsky wrote:
For what it's worth, I was not aware that Sword did not support the Apocrypha as Bible modules... This strikes me as a serious shortcoming (especially for scholarly purposes.) Is this a simple fix?Patrick Thus spake "Will Smith"> :Greetings. I am very much interested in possibly making the Deuterocanonical/Apocrypha books available as General Book modules. I don't know if/when Sword will support the Deuterocanonicals as Bible Modules, so I thought it might be easier to make them available as General Books. Would like feedback. Thank you. Will
