That sounds reasonable. I'm really looking forward to your ideas. You did such a good job with improving the look of the old sword website, it's hard to remember how bad the old one used to be!
-Troy.
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
Troy,
I do not want to be a trouble maker, but was that a "yes" or a "no" to using valid markup (X)HTML according to W3c web standards? If yes, what DOCTYPE? The only reason I ask is for consistency in development. May I suggest structural XHTML 1.0 Transitional. As the New York Public Library online Style Guide: http://www.nypl.org/styleguide/index.html
If "no" its going to be awfully hard to collaborate effectively.
by grace alone,
Don A. Elbourne Jr. http://elbourne.org
----- Original Message ----- From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 8:35 PM Subject: Standards (was: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface)
I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My hope is to do this and still allow others to turn features on (if they have the support) for a richer user interface.
I don't believe further comment on the NEED to (or not to) adhere to standards or support old browsers is necessary.
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
