sword-devel-request,您好！
======= 2003-10-28 您在来信中写道：======= >Send sword-devel mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of sword-devel digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. OSIS Web tool- Expanding side panels (Troy A. Griffitts) > 2. RE: OSIS Web tool - Strong's numbers (Victor Porton) > 3. Re: OSIS Web tool - unicode (Don A. Elbourne Jr.) > 4. Re: OSIS Web tool - unicode (Hugo van der Kooij) > 5. Re: OSIS Web tool- Expanding side panels (Don A. Elbourne Jr.) > 6. Re: OSIS Web tool-CVS question (Don A. Elbourne Jr.) > 7. Re: OSIS Web tool - unicode (Don A. Elbourne Jr.) > 8. RE: OSIS Web tool - Strong's numbers (Victor Porton) > 9. Re: OSIS Web tool - unicode (Chris Little) > 10. Re: OSIS Web tool-CVS question (Troy A. Griffitts) > 11. Re: OSIS Web tool - Strong's numbers (Troy A. Griffitts) > 12. Re: OSIS Web tool-CVS question (Jonathan Hunt) > 13. Re: OSIS Web tool - unicode (Joachim Ansorg) > >--__--__-- > >Message: 1 >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:22:20 -0700 >From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Expanding side panels >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >There is an experiment with expanding side panels on my passagestudy.jsp > >http://www.crosswire.org/sword/biblenew/scribe/passagestudy.jsp > >The idea to help lower bandwidth by only showing the preferred modules >and keeping the exhaustive lists under a collapsible subheading. > >Comments? > >Again, it probably doesn't look very nice. I really stink at making >things look nice. Anyone is welcome to beautify. > > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 2 >Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 02:23:18 +0500 (YEKT) >Organization: Extreme Code Software >From: Victor Porton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - Strong's numbers >Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On 27-Oct-2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> I added a basic Strong's and Morph toggle to the passagestudy.jsp. >I'd >> like to actually make it valuable by adding hover popups and make the >> link jump to someplace useful. Any ideas? I think Don posted a > >Strong obviously should go to a lex entry. It can display Greek word in >popup (dependingly on Web browser etc.) > >Morph should popup entries from Robinson/Packard. (It work well e.g. in >Mozilla only when all '\n' in an entry are replaced by ' '.) Sadly with >current Wb technology (not going to Java or like) it cannot be done really >goo looking. > >> standard way to do popups without javascript. Will this work with > >In HTML4 this typically produces a popup: > ><span title="This text will popup">Point mouse here</span> > >> unicode data? I did a mockup a while back with javascript that does > >Unicode should work by standard but often doesn't work in practice with >browser tooltips. > >-- >Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://ex-code.com) > >--__--__-- > >Message: 3 >From: "Don A. Elbourne Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:23:21 -0600 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >My suggestions is that we wrap any text needing a particular Unicode font >with a span and give that span a class attribute that matches the language >code. For example <span class="he"> for Hebrew. This will be more >semantically rich and forward compatible. We can then specify the Unicode >font in the CSS. > > >by grace alone, > >Don A. Elbourne Jr. >http://elbourne.org > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Don A. Elbourne Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 2:11 PM >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode > > >> Chris, >> >> I think you are right. That's what I was saying. I think we just need the >> UTF-8 meta tag in the page. I don't think the meta tag is absolutely >> necessary, but it is best practice afaik. >> >> by grace alone, >> >> Don A. Elbourne Jr. >> http://elbourne.org >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 12:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool >> >> >> > >> > >> > Joachim Ansorg wrote: >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > > Hash: SHA1 >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > >> > >>I have not worked with Unicode in web pages much so I admit my >> ignorance. >> > >>Chris investigated this a while back and I thought he had added the >> > >>document encoding in the meta tag. But I don't see it now. >> > > >> > > >> > > Yes, that's fine. That is for the browser to see that the page is in >> uTF8. >> > > But if "foreign" chars like Hebrew appear in the page we have to make >> the text >> > > use a special unicode font which has all the required unicode >> characters. So >> > > I wrap the unicode text with a span and set the right font-family >there. >> > > Often unicode needs a larger font-size because unicode chars are hard >to >> see >> > > if it's hebrew or something similair. >> > >> > Don & Joachim, >> > >> > Is this really necessary? (Have you seen text displayed incorrectly >> > using a browser?) >> > >> > Font selection is essentially the browser's job. I'm not sure if that's >> > necessarily so, but both MSIE and Mozilla select fonts on the basis of >> > scripts used in a document. >> > >> > If we need to do something more complex, since we have ICU at our >> > disposal, we can tag strings of text as using specific scripts, then >> > specify fonts in the CSS on that basis. >> > >> > --Chris >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > sword-devel mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 4 >Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 01:51:19 +0100 (CET) >From: Hugo van der Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: > >> My suggestions is that we wrap any text needing a particular Unicode font >> with a span and give that span a class attribute that matches the language >> code. For example <span class="he"> for Hebrew. This will be more >> semantically rich and forward compatible. We can then specify the Unicode >> font in the CSS. > >If my interpretation of the HTML specs are correctly we should use >something like: > ><span class="verse" lang=he"> > >See also: >http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-SPAN >http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#idx-lang_attribute > >Hugo. > >-- > All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/ > Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, > for they are subtle and quick to anger. > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 5 >From: "Don A. Elbourne Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Expanding side panels >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:37:31 -0600 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Troy, > >Good idea. > >What if we structured it like this: > ><h2>Translations:</h2> ><h3>Preferred Translations</h3> > <ul>list items</ul> ><h3>All Translations</h3> > <p>View/Hide</p> > <ul>list items</ul> > >That would keep a semantic markup. I took the liberty of making the small >change. See: >http://www.crosswire.org/sword/biblenew/delbourne/passagestudy.jsp > >I have not changed the CSS. Its using the same CSS as the parallel study. >The only thing I may had is the link style for the View/Hide link. > >I'm thinking too that someone could fix the jsp so that the link would read >either "View all" or "hide all" depending on the current view. If you want >me to add the +/- I can use a background image like we have in the Library >listing on index.jsp. > > >by grace alone, > >Don A. Elbourne Jr. >http://elbourne.org > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 11:54 AM >Subject: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool- Expanding side panels > > >> There is an experiment with expanding side panels on my passagestudy.jsp >> >> http://www.crosswire.org/sword/biblenew/scribe/passagestudy.jsp >> >> The idea to help lower bandwidth by only showing the preferred modules >> and keeping the exhaustive lists under a collapsible subheading. >> >> Comments? >> >> Again, it probably doesn't look very nice. I really stink at making >> things look nice. Anyone is welcome to beautify. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 6 >From: "Don A. Elbourne Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool-CVS question >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:39:23 -0600 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Troy, > >I hate to bother you with this, but I don't understand what this means. When >I do cvs update -d I get the following: > > >? wash.css >cvs server: Updating . >cvs update: move away ./wash.css; it is in the way >C wash.css > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 7 >From: "Don A. Elbourne Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:56:23 -0600 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Hugo, > >I agree. Ideally we would use the lang attribute. however, if I understand >correctly, browser support is very limited for it. Using a class in the >meantime seems to be the preferred practice. > >by grace alone, > >Don A. Elbourne Jr. >http://elbourne.org > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Hugo van der Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:51 PM >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode > > >> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >> >> > My suggestions is that we wrap any text needing a particular Unicode >font >> > with a span and give that span a class attribute that matches the >language >> > code. For example <span class="he"> for Hebrew. This will be more >> > semantically rich and forward compatible. We can then specify the >Unicode >> > font in the CSS. >> >> If my interpretation of the HTML specs are correctly we should use >> something like: >> >> <span class="verse" lang=he"> >> >> See also: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-SPAN >> http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#idx-lang_attribute >> >> Hugo. >> >> -- >> All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage. >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/ >> Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, >> for they are subtle and quick to anger. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 8 >Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:15:47 +0500 (YEKT) >Organization: Extreme Code Software >From: Victor Porton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - Strong's numbers >Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >On 27-Oct-2003 Victor Porton wrote: >> >> On 27-Oct-2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> I added a basic Strong's and Morph toggle to the passagestudy.jsp. >> I'd >>> like to actually make it valuable by adding hover popups and make the >>> link jump to someplace useful. Any ideas? I think Don posted a >> >> Strong obviously should go to a lex entry. It can display Greek word in >> popup (dependingly on Web browser etc.) > >I means it can display _the primary form_ of the Greek word in popup. > >-- >Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://ex-code.com) > >--__--__-- > >Message: 9 >Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:41:22 -0600 >From: Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Whatever needs to be done, the current situation is pretty unbearable. >I'm guess that any module encoded as UTF-8 is being rendered with Code >2000--which looks horrible for Latin. Since our goal (with Sword) is to >get all data into Latin, this is a problem that's going to get worse >with time. It's also just a generally bad solution since Code 2000 >doesn't encode all of the codepoints we use in all UTF-8 encoded >modules. (So we're forcing people to use a font that is frequently >incompatible with the module or unattractive to the point of not being >readable.) Letting the browser figure out which font to use worked a >lot better for me under Windows (which, let's face it, most of the >target audience will be using). > >BTW, with XHTML 1.1, the lang attribute is no longer valid. xml:lang >must be used instead. > >--Chris > > >Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >> Hugo, >> >> I agree. Ideally we would use the lang attribute. however, if I understand >> correctly, browser support is very limited for it. Using a class in the >> meantime seems to be the preferred practice. >> >> by grace alone, >> >> Don A. Elbourne Jr. >> http://elbourne.org >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Hugo van der Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:51 PM >> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >> >> >> >>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >>> >>> >>>>My suggestions is that we wrap any text needing a particular Unicode >> >> font >> >>>>with a span and give that span a class attribute that matches the >> >> language >> >>>>code. For example <span class="he"> for Hebrew. This will be more >>>>semantically rich and forward compatible. We can then specify the >> >> Unicode >> >>>>font in the CSS. >>> >>>If my interpretation of the HTML specs are correctly we should use >>>something like: >>> >>><span class="verse" lang=he"> >>> >>>See also: >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-SPAN >>>http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#idx-lang_attribute >>> >>>Hugo. >>> >>>-- >>> All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/ >>> Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, >>> for they are subtle and quick to anger. >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>sword-devel mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 10 >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:51:11 -0700 >From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool-CVS question >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Don, > This usually happens when somebody copied or created the wash.css file >in your directory INSTEAD OF CVS PLACING IT THERE. > > Basically CVS is saying, "Hey, there's a new file that I've never >copied to your 'shadow', but I can't copy it because there's already a >file there with the same name." You can just delete it (or if you have >changes that you want to preserve, move it to your home directory with >this command: > >mv wash.css ~ > >then do a checkout again and CVS will copy the file from the repository >to your 'shadow'. You can then either edit the wash.css and commit it >back, or copy (if you're sure you won't overwrite anyone's work) the >file back from your home over the top of the one CVS checked out: > >mv ~/wash.css . > >and commit that. > > Hope this helps and makes sense. > > -Troy. > >Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >> Troy, >> >> I hate to bother you with this, but I don't understand what this means. When >> I do cvs update -d I get the following: >> >> >> ? wash.css >> cvs server: Updating . >> cvs update: move away ./wash.css; it is in the way >> C wash.css >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 11 >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:53:05 -0700 >From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - Strong's numbers >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Victor, > Thanks. I'll try this out and see how it works. I'm not sure if I >should make the words into links and not even show the strongs numbers >and morphology, then have the hover popup be over each word, or if it >should actually show the numbers and popup over the numbers. What do >you think? > > -Troy. > > > >Victor Porton wrote: >> On 27-Oct-2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >> >>>Hey guys, >>> >>> I added a basic Strong's and Morph toggle to the passagestudy.jsp. >> >> I'd >> >>>like to actually make it valuable by adding hover popups and make the >>>link jump to someplace useful. Any ideas? I think Don posted a >> >> >> Strong obviously should go to a lex entry. It can display Greek word in >> popup (dependingly on Web browser etc.) >> >> Morph should popup entries from Robinson/Packard. (It work well e.g. in >> Mozilla only when all '\n' in an entry are replaced by ' '.) Sadly with >> current Wb technology (not going to Java or like) it cannot be done really >> goo looking. >> >> >>>standard way to do popups without javascript. Will this work with >> >> >> In HTML4 this typically produces a popup: >> >> <span title="This text will popup">Point mouse here</span> >> >>>unicode data? I did a mockup a while back with javascript that does >> >> >> Unicode should work by standard but often doesn't work in practice with >> browser tooltips. >> > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 12 >From: Jonathan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Don A. Elbourne Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool-CVS question >Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:58:09 +1300 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Hey, > >I've been a silent listener on the list so far. Don't know much about Sword >but can answer this ;-). >What this means is that wash.css was created on your computer or somehow got >into that folder thru some means other than via CVS. But now there is a file >in CVS called wash.css that CVS is trying to checkout into whatever directory >you're in. It won't overwrite a file it knows nothing about (ie the one that >is in the dir already) so its giving an error. >Simple solution: If you haven't modified wash.css an your computer then just >move it out of the way (rename it) and run cvs update again. > >Hope it helps (& is not too confusing), >Jonny > >On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 4:39 pm, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >> Troy, >> >> I hate to bother you with this, but I don't understand what this means. >> When I do cvs update -d I get the following: >> >> >> ? wash.css >> cvs server: Updating . >> cvs update: move away ./wash.css; it is in the way >> C wash.css >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > >-- >Jonathan Hunt (The Real Jonathan Hunt) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Jabber at [EMAIL PROTECTED] >"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." >Jim Elliot > > >--__--__-- > >Message: 13 >From: Joachim Ansorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:45:03 +0100 >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Chris, >I fixed it now and made use of xml:lang. Is it ok now? > > >Joachim > > >> Whatever needs to be done, the current situation is pretty unbearable. >> I'm guess that any module encoded as UTF-8 is being rendered with Code >> 2000--which looks horrible for Latin. Since our goal (with Sword) is to >> get all data into Latin, this is a problem that's going to get worse >> with time. It's also just a generally bad solution since Code 2000 >> doesn't encode all of the codepoints we use in all UTF-8 encoded >> modules. (So we're forcing people to use a font that is frequently >> incompatible with the module or unattractive to the point of not being >> readable.) Letting the browser figure out which font to use worked a >> lot better for me under Windows (which, let's face it, most of the >> target audience will be using). >> >> BTW, with XHTML 1.1, the lang attribute is no longer valid. xml:lang >> must be used instead. >> >> --Chris >> >> Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >> > Hugo, >> > >> > I agree. Ideally we would use the lang attribute. however, if I >> > understand correctly, browser support is very limited for it. Using a >> > class in the meantime seems to be the preferred practice. >> > >> > by grace alone, >> > >> > Don A. Elbourne Jr. >> > http://elbourne.org >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Hugo van der Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:51 PM >> > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] OSIS Web tool - unicode >> > >> >>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: >> >>>My suggestions is that we wrap any text needing a particular Unicode >> > >> > font >> > >> >>>with a span and give that span a class attribute that matches the >> > >> > language >> > >> >>>code. For example <span class="he"> for Hebrew. This will be more >> >>>semantically rich and forward compatible. We can then specify the >> > >> > Unicode >> > >> >>>font in the CSS. >> >> >> >>If my interpretation of the HTML specs are correctly we should use >> >>something like: >> >> >> >><span class="verse" lang=he"> >> >> >> >>See also: >> >>http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-SPAN >> >>http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/dirlang.html#idx-lang_attribute >> >> >> >>Hugo. >> >> >> >>-- >> >> All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage. >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/ >> >> Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, >> >> for they are subtle and quick to anger. >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >> >>sword-devel mailing list >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > sword-devel mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > >- -- ><>< Re: deemed! >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > >iD8DBQE/niyPEyRIb2AZBB0RArFyAJ9cyW/TkB8qOXRHMzJdqHy9ws7RwACeN0Ru >Q+8F13nzGFLsrmeVR0fakzg= >=LwYn >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > >--__--__-- > >_______________________________________________ >sword-devel mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > >End of sword-devel Digest > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 致 礼！ liuyang [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-28
<<FoxmailIcon: headpic64_64.GIF>>
