Is there anyone sponsoring the development of clucine? I was unable to get it to build on my Fedora Core 2 Test 2 system - but that's not surprising, there's other things (like gnomesword) that also currently don't build.
But clucine looks like it could be so useful for so many things, it seems like a good candidate for a bigger party to pick up and sponsor development for the project. I could see projects like scrollkeeper etc. from benefiting from such an indexing system. On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:24, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > William, > CLucene should still be a option for index searches. I haven't tried > it lately, but it is the indended route if you would like to use that > search engine. It not only is fast, but provides additional syntax > options for search strings. I don't know of anyone that has compiled it > on the Mac. It seems I always have a few small things I have to change > in the code to get it to compile, depending on for what system I'm > compiling it. My hope is that we can supply some patches to improve the > clucene build system. > > -Troy. *snip* -- Cheap Linux CD's - http://mpeters.us/linux/ _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
