Index has been messed up for some time. It currently returns the index into the 'testament' (old or new). The drivers have ot and nt data files and Index is used to compute the offset. It's dumb. I know. It needs to change. There is a NewIndex() method that should soon be renamed to replace the current Index() method. You should be able to call vk->Index(vk->NewIndex());
Hmmm... I'm sorry. Now that I look at your code, I'm not sure what's up. I would have though Mat.3.16 would have been an index much smaller than 24124.
AH!!! Sorry. Now I see. Yes! SWModule::Index was added for a previous implementation of a search engine which was submitted a couple years back. It was not accepted for a number of reasons, which included using external lexical parsing libraries and other things what were never cleaned up. I thought he had the SWModule::Index thing working though. I don't think anyone else uses it (obviously not if it's broken). Traditionally, it's against our container/key_domain concept to force a container to return a hash number for each of it's entries, though this is, in all practical senses, doable because the driver has a fixed number of entries on the disk. The safest way is to store the key value and use the key class to do the comparison. I know it's not more efficient than a 'long', but it's safest and works and will still work, even if entries have been added to the module.
Sorry, Index() should be fixed or removed.
-Troy.Will Thimbleby wrote:
Hi, Can someone help me with this code:
sword::VerseKey textkey = "matt3.16";
module->setKey(textkey);
NSLog(@"%d %@",module->Index(),fromUTF8((char *)module->getKey()->getText()));
module->Index(module->Index());
NSLog(@"%d %@",module->Index(),fromUTF8((char *)module->getKey()->getText()));
which prints:
24124 Matthew 3:16 24065 Matthew 1:7
I would have though module->Index(module->Index()); should change nothing. I'm trying to use the module's index to create lucene indexes, so that I can properly sort the results easily. I've been hacking lucene quite a bit and will post my thoughts later, I just need to fix this.
cheers --Will
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
