Personally I'm just looking forward to the Windows version of BibleTime. Until then, I'll make do with BibleCS as it is.
--Chris Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: > Also one sad thing about Sword is the BibleCS. It should be the flagship > of Sword. Now it's more like a prototype. Don't take me wrong, you know > that I have done much work with that (translating) and answered support > questions. But I really honestly think that it should be replaced > with something better, or improved greatly. I respect the work done by > Troy, Chris and others, but it has been quite clear that BibleCS is not > of top priority for them. Apparently they would like to do other > things, and it's not right that they have to put their energy into > something which is not very interesting. This is Open Source and we all > should love what we do, right? > > Why we don't attract developers and community? BibleTime has even > www-pages translated to many languages but BibleCS has not got updates > for the user interface translations, except my Finnish translation (at > least that I know of). Closed source products have active forums, > BibleCS (sub)forum gets 4 message threads per year, of which one was > "Is Sword for Windows Dead?". What's the problem? > > Yours, > Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x) > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
