Martin, I have no strong feelings about the virtual status of this method. If you feel there is a need for frontends to overwrite this, then we can change it for you. Do you think your changes would be a good replacement for the current implementation?
-Troy. Martin Gruner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >is there a reason why > > int copyDirectory(const char *urlPrefix, const char *dir, const >char *dest, >const char *suffix); > >in ftptrans.h is not virtual? This would allow frontends to reimlement on a > >higher level than getURL only. The current implementation of copyDirectory > >has the weakness that the counter for total data to be transferred >increases >as new directories are found and transferred. You can see this with the BAO > >module from Karl Kleinpaste, for example. The status reporter 'readjusts' >progress as it discovers the directory with the images, which holds the >actual data. > >Can we change the function definition above to make it virtual? > >God bless, > >mg > >_______________________________________________ >sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
