But Windows lacks it, I believe. I suppose we could absorb some BSD code, assuming it were short, to achieve the same end, but we can't just #include <unistd.h>.
--Chris Sergio QUEIROZ wrote: > getopt without GNU extensions is a part of the Unix Base Specifications > and should be available mostly everywhere. > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/getopt.html > > Yours, > > Sergio > > Le mercredi 26 septembre 2007 à 11:35 -0700, Chris Little a écrit : >> Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: >>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >>>> As DM has said previously, it >>>> would be really nice to have normal -options which are not order dependent. >>> Using GNU getopt? >>> http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Getopt.html >> Using anything from GNU would be a bad idea. Enduring "the chore >> involved in parsing typical unix command line options" makes our code >> more portable and avoids the need to license additional libraries. >> >> Writing a simple command line option parser isn't especially difficult >> or burdensome, anyway. >> >> --Chris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
