On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: > If there are no objections I will eliminate the "Latin1" from there so > that future readers will not be mislead. Latin1 is not the same as > cp1252 or iso-8859-1 after all as Chris pointed out and as already had > read in wikipedia, so it is not right to use that word in techical > documentation. I am pedantic and perfectionist, I admit that.
OK, I edited http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/DevTools:Modules#.conf_File_Layout and did my best to be accurate, informative, concise and neutral. Latin-1 is really used as a synonym/alias for ISO-8859-1 in for example Qt C++ library, Python standard library and Java library and also in http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets. Pedantic or not, I think that documentation should be accurate and unabiguous. Yours, Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x) _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
