HI Eeli, IMO we should hide the technical detail from the users. For them, only the "logical" function is interesting.
am Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2007 um 21:03 schrieben Sie: > Looking at both wiki .conf section and BibleTime code I noticed that > there is no strict logic in module categories. Several cases are > possible now, for example: > - technically a genbook, logically a Bible (though there are none atm.?) > - technically a genbook, logically a commentary (there are none?) > - technically a lexicon, logically a devotional > - technically a lexicon, logically an atlas (NETmaps) > - technically a genbook, logically an atlas > - technically a genbook, logically a lexicon (Hesychius) > But it's not possible to know all logical types or categories by just > looking at the conf file. > Would it be reasonable to add all the logical alternatives in > "Category"? Then it would include Commentaries, Bibles and Lexicons as > well. The frontend could then decide whether to show for example all > logical lexicons together or divide them in technical basis. > Yours, > Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x) > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Martin Gruner mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
