Chris wrote: > We can assume the Word documents are a good source, so proofing is
I've seen way too many documents that are not good sources, despite purporting to be so,to assume that they are good. > unnecessary beyond verifying that the Sword module is a good representation > of the Word document originals. There is a reason why Logos has somebody proof read their resources,even when they get clean copy directly from the publisher. > The "fluent in the target language" suggestion is just ridiculous. Format shifting always introduces errors. The only issue is how severe those errors are. xan jonathon _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
