Jonathan Morgan wrote: >> I'm still pretty well certain that we have the widest selection of modules >> among free programs, too, so it's a bit annoying that programs who've copied >> our library got higher marks. It seems like we ought to get a little credit >> for the fact that The Word, e-Sword, Online Bible, and Zefania are all >> enjoying content that came from us.
> I would have thought that e-Sword has more modules than we do. If user created resources are included, then e-Sword has thousands more than The Sword Project. If one just compares resources at e-sword.net and estudysource.com with those available for The Sword Project, then I think that it is a tie. Originally, I think the Online Bible was used for the source for free Bible Study programs. Then Sword Project resources were used. The current trend appears to be to use e-Sword resources. > Anyway, you can't really expect a person investigating the usefulness of > available software to determine whether it has been helped by the work of > others. True. > Again from the usability point of view, I claim that if a person cannot use a > feature, the fact that it is there does not help them. Cannot use the feature, or hasn't bothered to learn how to use the feature? xan jonathon _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
