No, that is what I did too. And for me it has become even more ludicrous as the license I signed explicitely includes recipients redistribution rights.
So my last report contained how many downloads I could find in our logs and how many times I found modules available on other sites in Google. Peter jhphx wrote: > Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> ... I need to report from time to time back to >> them how many have been downloaded. ... >> > > I was once also required to do this kind of thing but it was not > connected to the Sword Project. It was my contention that for various > reasons I could not guarantee an exact number. In discussions about the > problem I came to the conclusion that it did not matter if I used tea > leaves to produce a number as long as it wasn't fraud and represented a > good faith claim that the number was representative of the activity. In > the end I used a statistical approach to analyzing the logs to produce a > number I believed was good, if not 100% accurate. Also I would not > report the number by simply saying there were X downloads. I would > report something like, based on the fallowing sever log data and making > the fallowing assumptions, blah, blah, there were X downloads. That may > not be good enough for your situation but it was in my case. > > Jerry > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
