Hi Karl, Are we allowed to know who the main contact is at WBT/SIL for permitting these to be used by Crosswire?
I just tried two of these modules in SWORD 1.5.11 out of curiosity. * jvn_BL_1999 * miz_BL_2003 What languages are these, anyone know? There are needed some improvements in punctuation - eg. sometimes there's no space after a full-stop in the jvn module. Best regards, David Haslam Karl Kleinpaste-2 wrote: > > > The reason for the new increase in beta OSIS modules is due to the > arrival of 41 new WBT texts 2 days ago -- almost half the beta repo in > one shot. > > Significantly, a couple of really important modules (LXX, for one) are > still distributed as GBF. > > (Aside: All these new WBT texts appear in GS as "unknown" language. Is > there a mapping somewhere handy, from "ngu", "tzz", et al to something > readable by mere mortals? I'm happy to update GS to accommodate more > language definitions but I need a source for them.) > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-is-OSIS-preferred--Was-Re%3A-usfm2osis.pl-tp18197430p18221402.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
