Also, I noticed that the old swordreader website (
http://crosswire.org/swordreader/index.jsp ) has the only download listed as
version 1.0.0 (http://crosswire.org/swordreader/download.jsp ).  Perhaps
given the renewed focus on the user interface and usability should qualify
this as a new build (1.1.*) or even a completely new version (2.*.*), which
to me makes sense given the entirely new direction and attention that the
project is getting.

Just a thought.
-David

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:37 PM, David Overcash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Once the developers had this hammered out (I hope documented)--work began,
>> and I believe here is someone here who knows what has gone into each
>> package
>> to enhance it.  As we have seen, there are also members here who know what
>> went into the code, as test code, and once th results were gathered, the
>> code never came out.  If documented, maybe on the wiki, or the
>> swordreader.org website information and documentation for developers.
>
>
> Just so you all know...  I'm currently working on the swordreader.orgwebsite 
> and hopefully will have it nearly complete by Thursday, and mostly
> populated with all content by the end of next week.  This will, ideally,
> help us center the goals of the project and development together.  I haven't
> talked to David (Trotz) about it yet, but we should probably migrate or
> create a wiki at wiki.swordreader.org just for swordreader development.
>
> -David
>
>
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to