Do you think Bible.org would be amenable to our re-encoding their NET texts? As Karl pointed out, their encoding has some shortcomings that it would be nice to rectify.
And since I've been writing a Unicode report this evening, it has occurred to me that a re-encode might be a good opportunity to audit the characters they use to see whether they need any new Unicode characters for a faithful and accurate encoding. --Chris Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Bible.org has asked for us to place their free NET modules on our > server, in our public repository for added exposure until we release our > Master Remote Repo List technology discussed earlier this week. > > They are also very keen to add more of their content into their SWORD > Remote Module Repository. > > Can someone take the former task? > > How about the latter of reviewing their content and possibly helping > them decide which would be most easily adaptable for our software? > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
