On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrij.led...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen <eekai...@mail.student.oulu.fi> >> >> "BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and use (but >> not distribute) the program for personal, private, public or commercial >> purposes without restrictions.You can give away or distribute the program if >> you also distribute the corresponding source code. > > The "(but not distribute)" should be removed in my opinion. Cause the next > sentence tells you how you can distribute. > But yeah good notice. eBay is filled with OpenOffice being sold for £5 - £50 > with "digital distribution"
Maybe just change the sentence order? I was also slightly confused -- I would think we want to make the permissive statement first. Something like: "BibleTime is released under the GPL license. You can modify and give away, use or distribute the program by any method you choose with the sole restriction that you also distribute the corresponding source code. You can download and use (but not distribute) the program for personal, private or commercial purposes without restrictions." Still a little confusing, I think, but clearer than the original in my eyes. Then again, things usually are to their author. :) --Greg > -- > With best regards > > > Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima), > Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
