OK, thanks. The reason I asked for this info is a conversation Chris and I had a few days ago about the repos.
We thought, that if now a decent number of frontends support aV11N then really our Bibles should be published in this way - rather than in the often broken KJV fashion. Particularly we should not anymore publish new Bibles in unsuitable formats. But we also thought of introducing a "old" repository where we keep a KJV style copy around of those bibles we replaced in main. This would allow a more seamless move. Frontends with full aV11N support might simply decide to hide the "old" repo. And frontends not keen/unable to go this direction will not have an ever diminishing amount of modules (even if they do not get access to the newest and shiniest. We have not fully thought things through and certainly not started any work on that either, so suggestions and thoughts are more than welcome. Peter On 10/08/10 17:54, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > Would it be possible to get some short feedback which frontends are > capable of what aV11N wise? > > Also if support is not completed, does a schedule exist when support > will be there? > > Many thanks > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page