On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, scribe...@gmail.com <scr...@crosswire.org> wrote: > BibleCS, per my preference, only shows hover-over symbols for the note or > cross reference, and does not include the 'n' label. BibleCS uses different > filters though, so not affected. > > SWORDWeb will be affected. > > My thought on this is similar to strongs. Don't show the numbers. They are > left overs from the era of print-only. > > The exception use case is possibly our NET module which has a commentary > accompaniment module which might refer to footnotes by label. If I remember > correctly. > > So, I would like the choice to not have the label for the frontends I > maintain, but if users really want to see the label, I could be swayed on > this point, wearing my frontend developer hat. > > But I don't want to take away the choice from other potential frontend > developers. > > I understand Karl's desire to not want Xiphos and all other frontend > developers to do the work of adding the label, if everyone mostly wants the > label. > > Can we have both?
SWModule::RenderText(bool includeNumbers=false) Would that do the trick? --Greg > > Karl, I haven't looked at your patch yet, but is there a way to wrap the > label in a <span class="[fn,cx]-label"> then I can simply set display:none > for these in swordweb? > > Troy > > Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Bible Time does its own thing and wouldn't be bothered by this change. >>It >>dispenses with any semblance of delineation. Both notes and cross >>references are marked with "(*)" everywhere they appear. >> >>--Greg >>On Feb 7, 2012 9:38 PM, "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org> wrote: >> >>> To date, we have DM in support of n=X content in *n/*x, as well as >>Brian >>> noting that consistency should be supported in that note numbers >>provide >>> the common language of note reference. >>> >>> No one has suggested that such an update is a bad idea, though Troy >>> wondered aloud the other night in #xiphos about choice being taken >>away. >>> Considering that no other frontend (to my knowledge) makes any effort >>to >>> do Xiphos-style post-processing in order to get n=X content into >>place, >>> personally I think the question of choice is moot: All other >>frontends >>> simply take the null choice, that is, whatever the engine gives them, >>> n=X-less. >>> >>> My inclination remains to commit the patch, but I'm concerned that so >>> little feedback has been seen. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > -- > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
