Hi Daniel, On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Daniel Owens <dcowen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/29/2012 07:28 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Daniel Owens <dhow...@pmbx.net <mailto: >> dhow...@pmbx.net>> wrote: >> >> Well, it may be a poor markup choice on my part, but the Strongs >> modules are marked up the same way. I was just following the >> established pattern. >> >> I can see a couple of reasons to include a title in addition to >> the key: >> - Normally attributes are not displayed, only the content of >> elements, except @n in TEI and sometimes @osisID in OSIS genbooks (?) >> - I could see cases in which a lexicon key would not be identical >> to its title or head term, such as a full BDB module keyed to >> Strongs. The use of Strongs numbers in that case would be purely >> for the software to find the correct entry from a Bible tagged >> with Strongs numbers, not a part of the actual lexicon entry >> >> >> Wouldn't it be best to only display the two if they were different from >> each other, irrespective of what the TEI markup looked like? >> >> Jon >> >> You are probably right. How would that work? Would the TEI filter need > to test whether the title and the key are identical? Even in the case of > Strongs, they are not identical: H0001 (or 00001) for the key and H1 for > the title. > I didn't think of that, and I don't have an obvious solution to it either. What I was suggesting was just identical text for the two, as you say. Jon
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
