David, I suspected as much and don't deny the decision to support one or more installation sites resides with the client developer. That said, InstallMgr appears to be moving in that direction, which I think is a wonderful feature. I suspect different client developers influence each other feature-wise.
~A On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:23 AM, David Haslam <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew, > > Not all front-ends use the SWORD-based InstallMgr whose behaviour you just > observed. > > For a start, JSword based front-ends have their own JSword-based module > manager. > > So it would be unfair to generalize from what happens with one SWORD-based > front-end such as Xiphos. > > And, from what I can recall from earlier threads, PocketSword has its own > install manager, > even though the front-end itself is based on the SWORD API. No doubt Nic can > clarify this. > > David > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Legitimate-FTP-Mirrors-Module-Distribution-Rights-Question-tp4650611p4650621.html > Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
