Often, there's some obvious feature that requires a minimum Sword
version. Absent that, I have been setting 1.5.8. I'll probably bump that
to 1.6.1 after the release of 1.7.0.
There are two functions of MinimumVersion. One is to shelter users from
modules they can't use. Another is to strongly encourage users to
upgrade, nag their front end's maintainers to update, or switch to a
better-maintained front end-- we don't need to be dealing with library
bugs that were fixed five years ago.
--Chris
On 8/6/2013 12:48 AM, David Haslam wrote:
Questions:
(I hope these don't seem too naive to be asked in erudite company!)
When it's not something obvious such as support for av11n, how does one
determine what to specify for the *MinimumVersion* property in module.conf
files?
See
http://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#General_informatic_and_installer_elements
Example: Suppose I make a module using osis2mod from version 1.7.0 RC2 or
later, must I set
MinimumVersion=1.7.0
or is the answer/explanation much more complicated?
Is this informatic property purely related to module installation, etc?
Or is it something that front-ends might take into account?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/MinimumVersion-property-in-module-conf-files-tp4652983.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page