On 12/08/2014 06:57 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > xiphos.spec file is broken on RHEL-7 in many ways That's ... interesting, because my .spec is copied with a few mods to identify it as being for personal use from the one Greg uses for regular Fedora builds. It is used only for my personal builds that go into Testing, that is, from .spec %description:
>> This build produced by Xiphos development; not from official Fedora repo. > I have rather build it in COPR Never heard of that before. I looked, where it says >> Description not filled in by author which is simply wrong, the description is (largely) as it has been for years, though I'm pushing to drop the "formerly known as GnomeSword" tag because it's been 6 years after all. >> Instructions not filled in by author. I don't even know what that means. I don't understand why you're pushing this into publicly visible repos at this point, because I said pretty clearly that problems remain to be shaken out, and in fact I generated what's at the SF files' Testing link 3 times yesterday (now 3.9.3; the version rev rate will be high as shake-out continues) as bugs were chased down. Once the shake-out is complete, the real release of 4.0 will be let loose. Until then, it's for testing by people who know what they're doing.
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
