On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 18:19 -0400, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 09/01/2015 09:29 AM, DM Smith wrote: > > Having Abbreviation=KJV for a Thai module is clearly not the > > intent. To use it within a repo with uniqueness by language is > > entirely a bad idea. > I'm glad I didn't misunderstand this aspect.
Michael explains that "KJV" is what is - at least in missionary circles - used for the ThaiKJV. So, yes, this is the intent for Abbreviation as a user friendly option. Certainly I can see that within the Latin script area there may well be clashes for some modules - and we should simply not ever assume that the Abbreviation entry will always be unique across all repos and all modules in existence. It _must_ be unique for a user - and either the computer or the user must be able to resolve clashes. But we should neither assume uniqueness nor rely upon that until a frontend has given for a particular moment the "all clear". Peter _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
